AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Adobe connect test meeting8/21/2023 Johnny plans a US visit in, say February, to be able to get some further insight in the usage of Connect and am wondering if some else of you would care to join. A visit to Adobe and some US universities during Q1 2010 Joke will promote contact with John Schuman, Education Solutions Architect, Adobe Systems Inc. Will get help to setup a visit, say, late February. Presentation of Adobe Education in EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa)ĥ. Presentation of SUNET's Adobe Connect serviceĢ. Summary from a meeting with David Heath, Adobe's learning managerĭavid Heath, Director of Education Sales EMEA, Adobe Systemsġ. Jan: No documentation for the configuration of the media gateway. Connect 7.5īatic: using 7.5 has helped in audio problems Mustang 3_0_4_431, the version of FMS in AC 7.5 2. Jan Ruzicka: according to the documentation, SSL should be run on a different server with a different IP addressīatic -> Jan: Michael Krsek(?) had been evaluating Flash media servers - could he run some tests on the FMS used inside ACP setupīatic: FMS r. How could we test system performance without involving people?Īdobe should have some means for such a test Number of active meetings, number of active users, file usage, etc. What tools exist to monitor the behavior of the system on a daily basis? Pasi Häkkinen: (11:38) My experience from SUNET test 5: audio and video worked mostly OK, but UI had big delays: chat messages came 1 min late in worst case Some were satisfied with the meetings, while some others were not satisfied at all. The cpus of both servers went up to 100% and reports from users show that the experiences varies a lot. This gives us 80% video senders and applying that on all meeting rooms we got 5.2 video senders in each room and a total of 250 video senders. Measured in the 26 testing rooms were an average of 8 users of which 6.5 were sending video. Maximum number of concurrent users were 313, they were spread out in 48 meeting rooms with an average of 6.5 users in each room. Is Adobe Connect mainly a presentation tool? Or the collaboration tool that we want? Unfortunately we missed to test a parallel meeting in a less crowded meeting. We had a delay on about 15 seconds with at most 90 seconds. During this time the cpu of both servers went up to 100% and it became impossible to have a reasonable dialog. According to reports from the rooms the meetings worked well.Īfter the scheduled test those who were left decided to gather in one room, where we were at most 48 users of which 36 were sending video. The CPU on one server want up to at most 100% and the other to 90%. The mean value of number of users were 8.45 in each room with around 6.5 sending video. Test in many rooms took place 13:00-17:00 with a maximum of 228 concurrent users spread out in 18 test rooms plus some more rooms with single participant in each. We had instructed people to arbitrary join 50 test rooms. See my earlier mail on a suggested structure (see below in the minutes)ĭata Communications Specialist - Funet - Video Technology No details are ready yet.Yes, I know this is not living as I preach, however, there are some benefits of making visits in flesh and blood. I plan a US visit in, say February, to be able to get some further insight in the usage of Connect and am wondering if some else of you would care to join. Summary from a meeting with David Heath, Adobe's learning managerĤ. Has anyone upgraded? Sunet plan to do it during Christmas vacationģ.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |